Automated Quant Journal
Nasdaq futures / NQ-only desk review
Week: May 29–June 5, 2026 ET
Performance terminal

📊 Weekly NQ Trade Desk Self-Grade

A compact self-audit of this week’s automated NQ calls. The system handled the early-week upside structure well, but was too slow to downgrade bullish bias as Friday’s selloff accelerated. Raw positioning details remain internal; positioning was checked as part of the process.

Journal coverage: 84 reports seen lifetime; 47 unique NQ reports evaluated in this weekly window; 175 graded horizon outcomes.

Setups graded
47
Unique weekly NQ reports; 175 graded horizons
A/B outcome rate
74.3%
130 of 175 graded horizon outcomes
Target-hit rate
47.4%
Directional target level reached before horizon close
Invalidation / stop-hit
23.4%
Opposing level touched across graded horizons
Directional accuracy
49.7%
Move direction aligned with call bias
Avg MFE
+60.6 pts
Average favorable excursion where available
Avg MAE
96.7 pts
Average adverse excursion where available
Avg R multiple
Missing
Risk unit / trade sizing not present in journal

Horizon Performance

Directional accuracy, target hits, invalidations, and excursions by forecast horizon. Labels include status text and do not rely on color alone.
HorizonGradedDirectional AccuracyTarget HitInvalidation HitAvg MFEAvg MAEAssessment
30m4447.7%40.9%22.7%+34.2 pts48.4 ptsMixed / noisy
60m4450.0%45.5%22.7%+43.8 pts69.0 ptsAcceptable but weak edge
120m4450.0%50.0%22.7%+64.8 pts117.5 ptsBest balanced horizon
240m4351.2%53.5%25.6%+100.4 pts153.0 ptsHighest target capture

Setup Types

Best and worst setup buckets from available fields.
TypeOutcomesTarget HitAvg Score
Best: Bull / stretched13258.3%90.9
Bear / balanced785.7%88.4
Worst: Bull / balanced360.0%72.4

No-Trade Condition Quality

No explicit no-trade field exists in the journal. Using “balanced + weak edge / high reversal risk” as a proxy, the system did not abstain enough on Friday. Quality: Needs improvement.

Missing: formal no-trade labels, confidence score, stop distance, and R-multiple fields.

Data Completeness

Available: grade, bias, stretched flag, support/resistance hits, MFE/MAE, horizon moves. Missing: explicit setup taxonomy, R multiple, sizing, slippage, and trade execution outcomes. Pending: final Friday 240m windows.

What Worked

  • Longer horizons captured more of the weekly structure.
  • Early-week bullish/stretched calls were repeatedly rewarded.
  • The late Friday bearish flip graded well on available 30m–120m windows.

What Failed

  • Directional accuracy near coin-flip is not acceptable as a standalone edge.
  • Friday bullish calls remained active through a fast regime break.
  • Bull/balanced bucket produced zero target hits this week.

Adjustments for Next Week

  • Add a volatility/regime-break circuit breaker after large VWAP deviations.
  • Downgrade or no-trade bull/balanced setups until target-hit rate recovers.
  • Require explicit stop distance and R-multiple logging for every setup.
  • Score 120m/240m higher than 30m when horizons conflict.