Automated Quant Journal
Nasdaq futures / NQ-only desk reviewWeek: Jun 15–Jun 19, 2026 ET
Performance terminal
📊 Weekly NQ Trade Desk Self-Grade
NQ-only weekly audit for Jun 15–Jun 19, 2026 ET. Score reflects available horizon outcomes; raw GEX/options-positioning details remain internal.
Journal coverage: 174 reports seen lifetime; 42 unique weekly NQ reports evaluated; 140 graded horizon outcomes; 28 pending windows excluded.
Setups graded
42
Unique weekly NQ reports; 140 graded horizons
A/B outcome rate
13.6%
19 of 140 graded outcomes
Target-hit rate
51.4%
Directional target level reached before horizon close
Invalidation / stop-hit
0.0%
Opposing level touched across graded horizons
Directional accuracy
55.0%
Move direction aligned with call bias proxy
Avg MFE
80.4 pts
Average favorable excursion where available
Avg MAE
82.5 pts
Average adverse excursion where available
Avg R multiple
Missing
Risk unit / trade sizing not present in journal
Horizon Performance
| Horizon | Graded | Directional Accuracy | Target Hit | Invalidation Hit | Avg MFE | Avg MAE | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30m | 36 | 55.6% | 44.4% | 0.0% | 50.5 pts | 46.5 pts | Weak edge |
| 60m | 35 | 54.3% | 48.6% | 0.0% | 65.5 pts | 63.6 pts | Weak edge |
| 120m | 35 | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0% | 89.7 pts | 93.2 pts | Weak edge |
| 240m | 34 | 55.9% | 58.8% | 0.0% | 117.6 pts | 129.0 pts | Weak edge |
Setup Types
| Type | Outcomes | Target Hit | Avg Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull / balanced | 140 | 51.4% | 65.1 |
No-Trade Condition Quality
No explicit no-trade field exists in the journal. Proxy assessment uses weak directional/target evidence and elevated invalidation risk. Quality: Acceptable.
Missing: formal no-trade labels, confidence score, stop distance, and R-multiple fields.
Data Completeness
Available: grade, trend proxy, stretched flag, support/resistance hits, MFE/MAE, horizon moves. Missing: explicit setup taxonomy, R multiple, sizing, slippage, and execution outcomes. Pending windows this week: 28.
What Worked
- Automated journal and grading pipeline produced a usable weekly audit without exposing raw positioning internals.
- Best available setup bucket: Bull / balanced with 51.4% target-hit rate.
- Longer horizon rows highlight whether calls matured beyond first-noise reactions.
What Failed
- Formal R-multiple, stop-distance, and execution/slippage fields are still missing from the journal.
- Worst available setup bucket: Bull / balanced with 51.4% target-hit rate.
- Repeated pending rows in the raw grade log require deduplication during dashboard aggregation.
Adjustments for Next Week
- Log explicit setup type, confidence, stop distance, target distance, and R multiple for every report.
- Penalize or suppress setup buckets whose target-hit rate falls below 40% over the rolling week.
- Keep raw GEX/options details internal, but add a simple confluence tag for post-trade scoring.
- Favor 120m/240m evidence over 30m noise when weekly horizon results diverge.