Performance terminal

📊 Weekly NQ Trade Desk Self-Grade

NQ-only scalp audit for Jul 13–Jul 17, 2026 ET. Score reflects 5m/15m/30m/60m horizon outcomes; raw GEX/options-positioning details remain internal.

Journal coverage: 396 reports seen lifetime; 38 unique weekly NQ reports evaluated; 148 graded horizon outcomes; 4 pending windows excluded.

Setups graded

Unique weekly NQ reports; 148 graded horizons

A/B outcome rate

20.3%

30 of 148 graded outcomes

Target-hit rate

28.4%

Directional target level reached before horizon close

Invalidation / stop-hit

12.8%

Opposing level touched across graded horizons

Directional accuracy

51.4%

Move direction aligned with call bias proxy

Avg MFE

47.9 pts

Average favorable excursion where available

Avg MAE

83.7 pts

Average adverse excursion where available

Avg R multiple

Missing

Risk unit / trade sizing not present in journal

Horizon Performance

Directional accuracy, target hits, invalidations, and excursions by forecast horizon. Labels include status text and do not rely on color alone.
Horizon	Graded	Directional Accuracy	Target Hit	Invalidation Hit	Avg MFE	Avg MAE	Assessment
5m	34	47.1%	17.6%	8.8%	36.1 pts	27.9 pts	Weak edge
15m	38	50.0%	26.3%	13.2%	37.5 pts	70.4 pts	Weak edge
30m	38	57.9%	31.6%	13.2%	48.6 pts	97.4 pts	Weak edge
60m	38	50.0%	36.8%	15.8%	68.2 pts	133.1 pts	Weak edge

Experimental Strategy Agents

Separately graded strategy modules. Keep, upgrade, or delete agents based on directional rate, score, and excursion balance after enough samples.
Strategy Agent	Outcomes	Directional	Avg Score	Avg MFE	Avg MAE
ict_smc_sweep_reclaim	17	100.0%	100.0	220.0 pts	-85.4 pts
ict_smc_sweep_reject	8	62.5%	81.2	117.7 pts	29.2 pts
ten_am_open_levels	129	58.1%	77.2	76.1 pts	5.9 pts
candle_range_theory	181	44.2%	71.0	74.8 pts	47.2 pts
session_key_levels	85	38.8%	67.8	55.0 pts	57.8 pts
sdtv_manipulation_leg	113	36.3%	66.8	36.6 pts	61.4 pts
ote_retracement	40	25.0%	61.0	-55.7 pts	128.7 pts

Setup Types

Best and worst setup buckets from available fields.
Type	Outcomes	Target Hit	Avg Score
Bear/Neutral / balanced	136	30.9%	66.5
Bull / balanced	12	0.0%	52.9

No-Trade Condition Quality

No explicit no-trade field exists in the journal. Proxy assessment uses weak directional/target evidence and elevated invalidation risk. Quality: Needs improvement.

Missing: formal no-trade labels, confidence score, stop distance, and R-multiple fields.

Data Completeness

Available: grade, trend proxy, stretched flag, support/resistance hits, MFE/MAE, horizon moves, and forward strategy-agent tags. Missing: execution fills, slippage, and true tick/100t bars. Pending windows this week: 4.

What Worked

Automated journal and grading pipeline produced a usable weekly audit without exposing raw positioning internals.
Best available setup bucket: Bear/Neutral / balanced with 30.9% target-hit rate.
Longer horizon rows highlight whether calls matured beyond first-noise reactions.

What Failed

Formal R-multiple, stop-distance, and execution/slippage fields are still missing from the journal.
Worst available setup bucket: Bull / balanced with 0.0% target-hit rate.
Repeated pending rows in the raw grade log require deduplication during dashboard aggregation.

Adjustments for Next Week

Log explicit setup type, confidence, stop distance, target distance, and R multiple for every report.
Penalize or suppress setup buckets whose target-hit rate falls below 40% over the rolling week.
Keep raw GEX/options details internal, but add a simple confluence tag for post-trade scoring.
Weight 5m/15m/30m evidence highest; treat 60m as context rather than the default hold window.